<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I’m in a mess with LinkedIn – what do you advise?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northernlightspr.com/im-in-a-mess-with-linkedin-what-do-you-advise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northernlightspr.com/im-in-a-mess-with-linkedin-what-do-you-advise/</link>
	<description>Northern Lights PR: We&#039;ll help you drive business growth, minimise crises and engage your employees</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:20:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.northernlightspr.com/im-in-a-mess-with-linkedin-what-do-you-advise/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 11:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northernlightspr.com/?p=4737#comment-374</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Victoria. I only accept people on Linkedin that I have met, spoken to or corresponded with and I am pretty sure that I want to meet or do business with again.  I’ve reached that age in life when frankly I can start being rather choosy about whom I want to connect with and I don’t want to connect with any tom, dick or harry and their female equivalents.  Usually, I just send them an email asking if we have we ever met, or spoken, and if not, why do you want to connect with me. If their answer is half decent I might say yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Victoria. I only accept people on Linkedin that I have met, spoken to or corresponded with and I am pretty sure that I want to meet or do business with again.  I’ve reached that age in life when frankly I can start being rather choosy about whom I want to connect with and I don’t want to connect with any tom, dick or harry and their female equivalents.  Usually, I just send them an email asking if we have we ever met, or spoken, and if not, why do you want to connect with me. If their answer is half decent I might say yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jane hustwit</title>
		<link>http://www.northernlightspr.com/im-in-a-mess-with-linkedin-what-do-you-advise/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>jane hustwit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northernlightspr.com/?p=4737#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Interesting .... wonder if our behaviour is shifting, perhaps as a result of Twitter? 
For me, this goes back to the classic question for any communications - what are your objectives?  what are you trying to achieve? why are you using LinkedIn? for what purpose?  

So if you are looking for new business leads, in a different sector or if you are not concerned about where they come from, you take a more liberal approach.  In this way, you may pick up interest from distant, unanticipated connections.  However, if you want to develop an exclusive or defined set of connections, you would be inclined to stick to the criteria you set out. 

I tend to opt for people who I think I might do business with or with whom I have some degree of familiarity. I am deeply antipathetic to those who don&#039;t personalise, often being slow to reply  and then (usually) with a personal note! I have to confess that if I am sure I don&#039;t wish to connect, for whatever reason, I take the easy option and ignore the invitation.  It&#039;s highly unlikely to be from someone who had made the effort to contact ME. 

As for offence being taken, I doubt it - probably more &quot; I wonder why not???&quot;  Especially as I suspect your courteous approach is unusual.  People are probably much more likely to ignore an invitation, as I do. 
Maybe we need to be more mindful of the impact of not connecting, however we do it - after all, it&#039;s still sending a message. We need to consider whether it is the one we want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting &#8230;. wonder if our behaviour is shifting, perhaps as a result of Twitter?<br />
For me, this goes back to the classic question for any communications &#8211; what are your objectives?  what are you trying to achieve? why are you using LinkedIn? for what purpose?  </p>
<p>So if you are looking for new business leads, in a different sector or if you are not concerned about where they come from, you take a more liberal approach.  In this way, you may pick up interest from distant, unanticipated connections.  However, if you want to develop an exclusive or defined set of connections, you would be inclined to stick to the criteria you set out. </p>
<p>I tend to opt for people who I think I might do business with or with whom I have some degree of familiarity. I am deeply antipathetic to those who don&#8217;t personalise, often being slow to reply  and then (usually) with a personal note! I have to confess that if I am sure I don&#8217;t wish to connect, for whatever reason, I take the easy option and ignore the invitation.  It&#8217;s highly unlikely to be from someone who had made the effort to contact ME. </p>
<p>As for offence being taken, I doubt it &#8211; probably more &#8221; I wonder why not???&#8221;  Especially as I suspect your courteous approach is unusual.  People are probably much more likely to ignore an invitation, as I do.<br />
Maybe we need to be more mindful of the impact of not connecting, however we do it &#8211; after all, it&#8217;s still sending a message. We need to consider whether it is the one we want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
